BG5FUM Well, after reading some reviews, it seems that HFSS is more complex, and CST doesn't require users to manually create air walls. MMANA-GAL is a simplified version, and the analysis models are also different. It assumes that all conductors are very thin lines relative to the wavelength, and then solves iteratively. Therefore, the iterative approach affects accuracy. Also, it becomes inaccurate when solving for frequencies above 1 GHz, mainly due to the iterative nature. Furthermore, it cannot handle waveguides or microstrip structures. The advantage of MMANA-GAL is its simplicity and intuitiveness, and everyone seems to agree that it's good.