BI1VHV
I'm just stating a fact.
Received notice regarding radio station (station) setup and usage permit - application denied.
Clearly, this is intended for use by collective stations (or clubs/organizations).
The applicant, Mr. Li (the original poster), clearly does not make sense. The applicant should be named after the company.
The application form located below the screenshot.
Company Name: "Empty"
Organization Code Certificate: "Empty"
Contact Person: The original poster (楼主)
Applying for a "collective station" under your own name is clearly going to be rejected, regardless of whether you log in to the government portal as an individual or as a legal entity.
Although each local government website has different policies and personnel for interpreting and implementing them, applying for a collective radio station individually is clearly not the correct procedure.
Therefore, when I received a reply stating that "the company must provide materials and organizational codes in the company's name, and cannot apply under individual names," I found this to be reasonable.
BG2VAR
From what I understand as an ordinary observer,
The original poster has a Beijing callsign and set up a club station in Liaoning in August 2024. He was informed that his license application is still pending.
The other people had already completed their call sign processing, leaving only these few. It feels like they're deliberately slowing things down; why did it take so long for the other five to get theirs? I might have to file a complaint.
Is it possible that the procedures are relatively simple? In terms of extending and modifying existing licenses, the requirements are generally less than those for establishing a new one.
Let's assume, purely by chance: What if there was a situation similar to what I initially described, where someone logs in using their legal entity name and applies for a club station, but doesn't fill in any company information, only personal information? This personal information belongs to the applicant, not the technical person in charge. After all, the application form is essentially the same nationwide, and you can easily see the difference by opening the original form. The processing was also confusing, as they usually fill in personal accounts for this purpose, but now a legal entity account logged in and filled out the call sign application. Finally, after research, it was determined that no unit information was provided, resulting in a personal call sign being assigned to the user (because, well, everyone understands, let's not delve into details). The process was slow, like solving an exam where all the easy questions are answered first, then you have to scratch your head for the more difficult ones, and eventually someone finds them for you. This type of situation is rare, but if it happens, just do some research and get away with it.
It's now April 25th, and this person is applying again for a new license. The new application requires personal information, as the previous application was incorrectly processed, making it impossible to obtain a callsign. According to regulations, individuals cannot apply for a collective radio station. The reason for rejection is perfect; there's nothing wrong with it! Regarding the individual station, I don't understand. The answer to the first question is the same as the answer to the second question. What does this mean? I don't know what the background looks like, or if the titles are the same. If they are, I can't tell which one is for an individual and which one is for a collective station. They were both rejected.
Who knows that this person started with a lawsuit, and then, later on, they didn't summarize the situation much further.
BI1VHV
I advise you to consider this: a single clap doesn't make a sound, and a table without filling is useless. If you haven't done this process before (considering how often a club station can operate), research and communicate thoroughly. Seek advice from relevant personnel or local enthusiasts; experience is crucial.
Let's say I were to do this. The first thing I would do is deregister call sign 2, because it's useless. Giving two people a call sign won't help them get promoted or earn more money, and it will only create more problems for them. Three call signs? That sounds impressive, but in this industry, even one call sign can bring respect.
After I completed the logout process, I applied for a club station.
Then, based on the feedback from 無委 (the local radio regulatory authority), I would ask previous enthusiasts who have operated a "collective station" for clarification on the proper procedures and important considerations. Finally, I would complete the application again.
Even if rejected, identifying and addressing the issues, and making improvements, definitely makes operating under a club or repeater license much more complex than using a personal call sign. I have extensive experience in this area, and I can attest to its complexity.
Furthermore, starting with complaints and lawsuits is an extremely extreme approach. If I were a staff member, the more extreme I am, the more cautious I would need to be. I would also worry about making mistakes and only rely on vague information. Rather than risk saying something wrong, it's better not to say anything at all.
I understand that Mr. Lou's intention is to use this as an opportunity to optimize the process with 無委 (the local radio regulatory authority). In reality, there are no issues that cannot be addressed through direct communication.
And most importantly, don't bring a pace; all five call signs have already been used, and I won't give one to you either, because the question types and difficulty levels are different.
You seem to think that simply filing a complaint and then withdrawing it would resolve the issue. But does the government website have an internal accountability process? If you withdraw the complaint, won't they not pursue any further action or find any loopholes? And wouldn't anyone believe that you were trying to use this opportunity to enhance your reputation? Or are you hoping to acquire a negative reputation through "无委"?
I won't be responding to this post anymore. The original poster should think about it carefully. I suggest the original poster contacts the moderators, locks the post, or asks the moderators to demote and delete it. Honestly, I'm just bored and don't want to waste my time on this.
闽ICP备2021006864号-7
闽公网安备35020602002794号