如题，本人最近刚刚取得了新B操作证，打算想要上短波玩一玩。看了论坛内其他帖子的回复，打算想要满足以下需求的设备： - SDR 架构，听大佬们说现在新出的基本都是 SDR 架构了，而且带有频谱图，感觉对小白友好一点 - 尽量自带内置天调等功能本人预算 8k-10k 以内，想要一步到位买个好点的一直使用。看了一圈感觉 ic7300 很不错，现在某宝上面代购也只要刚好 6k。可惜的是没有 UV 段（也不是什么必要的需求，带 UV 的 9700 又太贵了买不起），不知道大佬们还有没有什么其他的推荐，比如八重洲有没有类似的设备，或者国产的怎么样。以及 ic705 等 QRP 电台加上功放的操作是否可行呢？功放我查了一下貌似都要 1k 多，感觉这样折腾一趟性价比就远低于 ic7300 了😰

用过 G90, FT710, FTDX10, IC7610, FLEX8400。依照您的预算和需求的话我会果断向您推荐 FT710（我于海外购买折合5,000CNY），优秀的性能、新的 SDR 架构，不足之处则在于远程操作不够友好。顺便提一嘴，SDR 架构可以省下大把买传统滤波器的钱哈哈。如果预算极为不足，G90 则认为是一个综合性价比和体验的入门级方案。除此之外不推荐国产的任何短波机器，>!尤其某 PMR 型号!

打算在广东上执照，听说广东新B 100W设备只要写承诺书就行

https://forum.hamcq.cn/?q=%E7%9F%AD%E6%B3%A2 https://forum.hamcq.cn/?q=%E6%96%B0b

如果你是家用，偶尔野架，那么7300是很合适的选择了。

IC-9700 可没有短波哦，预算8k Yaesu 可以买 FTDX10 了

sdr架构≠带频谱，传统架构≠没有频谱，这俩之间无任何关系

@"Syryia"#p60665 xiegu G106c 和 yaesu FT991A

我觉得7300是个很不错的选择。705在频段上固然是兼顾短波和UV了，但是在UV段你想上功放来填补功率上的不足就会很麻烦。成品功放一般没有50MHz的，所以你得买3-30MHz、144MHz、430MHz成品功放各一台，然后再DIY一个50MHz的功放。大功率天调也是一笔开销，搞不好也要按波段准备两三个。建议选短波+50MHz的百瓦机，搭配一个25瓦的国产数模车台，这样就都能玩了。个人认为如果不是有志于深耕卫星+EME就没必要买9700。

@"BI1NIZ"#p60666 G106C就算了，别误导人家😄

1：7300成熟稳定，操作又简便，就这个啦。 2：FT-991A是有短波和UV段，只是吧，那个频谱有点那啥，差点意思。 3：IC-705不错，又便携，支持的频段又多，但是价格现在不太友好。作为已经有百瓦短波台的人来说，705作为第二台设备是不错的选择。 4：FT-710，新型号，在成熟度上当然是比不上已经出来很多年销量10W+的IC-7300了。 5：FT-DX10混合构架，理由同4。 6：协谷G90，如果只是试试水，其实也没必要花太多钱，2K出头就能搞定，满足个基本功能，频谱图倒也是有的。 7：G106C，有一个简易频谱，但是真不推荐，虽然便宜，但喇叭太糟糕，便携玩下CW可以。

7300就是一个烟灰缸。 SDR在业余界比较好的只有 FlexRadio 6*** 靠谱。其他都是呵呵，，，自嘲说够用够用。

Recommendations for new shortwave receivers

BG5VCU-VK2VCU-AK6CU

BG6HFD The FLEX6400 and 6600 have always been in the second tier. I remember that a couple of other models from the 6000 series were quite good and were in the first tier previously.

In reality, it's not necessarily about buying the absolute best; the key is to choose based on actual user needs.

My 710 was also experiencing performance over-optimization. When I put it in my home, I didn't have a good antenna. The first time I heard about it potentially burning out, I started to pay more attention... I was using it at low brightness, basically for display purposes.

BG6HFD

BG5VCU-VK2VCU-AK6CU Yes, the top few radio stations are all quite good, and in normal circumstances, you can't tell them apart.

BG6HFD

BG5VCU-VK2VCU-AK6CU Then, with the low brightness and screen saver enabled, it should prevent burn-in. Burn-in occurs when you can see the imprint of the main interface underneath when pressing the menu button, as well as imprints from the frequency above.
There are also enthusiasts in foreign forums who have experienced this situation: Although DX10 is an LCD screen, prolonged use at high brightness can cause the screen to heat up, which may lead to malfunctions within the liquid crystal.

BG7NOD

BG6HFD I suddenly have a vague memory – are you the one who replaced the screen on the DX10?

BG6HFD

BG7NOD Yes, because the original screen was too expensive, so I came up with an alternative solution.

BG5VCU-VK2VCU-AK6CU

BG6HFD As for Roger, I'll take good care of him. If any problems arise, I'll have to fix them myself.

BH9FOW

It must be the FT-991A and IC-705. I own both; the 991A has a simple built-in antenna tuner, and the 705's antenna tuner is very small and portable.

However, if you frequently operate in remote locations, I recommend the FT-891. It's very compact and lightweight, with a small body, and can achieve full power (100W) for extended periods.

BG7NOD

BH9FOW The 991A is also quite compact, and I almost bought one before.

BH6BAS

I don't require a power of 15W, and for most people, jumping straight to DX10 is fine. Of course, the 101MP is also very good. If you have enough budget, I personally think that this is the product of the current era. For advanced use, you can start with: Domestic equipment → 7300 or 710 (there's not much difference, they are both the same) → DX10 → Mixed SDR dual receivers like 101MP

BG7NOD

BH6BAS The 710, DX10, and 101MP are all products from the same series. The 101MP was released first, followed by the DX10, and finally the 710. However, there were rumors that the 710 was originally intended to be released before the DX10. But these three models are all from the same era.

BG7NOD

BH6BAS A common flaw in these Yaesu models is their lack of built-in network functionality. They require an external device, which can be expensive, and even the top-of-the-line 101MP model lacks this feature, making it a bit disappointing.

BG5VCU-VK2VCU-AK6CU

BH6BAS For the average person, going straight for something like the DX10 or 101MP is the best approach. Otherwise, the cost of this growth path would be too high (although, to be fair, radio equipment still retains value). Furthermore, it's easy to get stuck in a cycle of buying new equipment due to problems with existing devices. When considering current trends, I believe that some foreign radios that natively support standard internet protocols (TCP/IP, UDP/IP, and VITA-49) are more representative.

BI1XNN

BG7NOD

The reason I bought the X6100 was because my budget was limited while I was still in school.

BG7NOD

BI1XNN The 6100 is okay because it's cheap, but the 6200 is too expensive.

BG7NOD

BG5VCU-VK2VCU-AK6CU Have you used the SUNSDR2 Pro before? What are your thoughts on it?

BG6HFD

BG5VCU-VK2VCU-AK6CU Here's the situation: Selling used equipment after tinkering with it will definitely result in a loss, and given the limited size of the community, even if the prices are high, they won't sell. The fact that Yaesu's machines of this generation all use external network card solutions is what I find most frustrating. Another frustrating point is that DX10 has removed the 101's high-precision ADC, which is the same as the 710, and the interface is also more like the 710 than the 101, giving a feeling of precise operation.

BG5VCU-VK2VCU-AK6CU

BG7NOD 没玩过，没有发言权。国内有其他爱好者在竞赛时候用，可以去和他们交流一下

BG7NOD

BG6HFD The price was listed there, which was 2K more expensive than the 710, but it was still a good deal because of the precise technique. However, since both the 710 and DX10 are dual-ADC systems, the dynamic range issue is essentially resolved, so a 14-bit ADC is perfectly sufficient. It's nowhere near as good as something like the 7300, which is always saturated.

BG7NOD

BG6HFD I bought another FT-710 specifically because I liked the appearance and compact size of the FT-710, especially when used with a DX10. However, I was also pleasantly surprised by the level of performance achieved using a pure SDR setup from Yaesu. It's lighter, smaller, cheaper, and performs incredibly well. I really love it.

BG6HFD

BG7NOD Thank you for sharing! I was wondering if you noticed any significant differences while using these two devices.

BG7NOD

BG6HFD The most direct experience is with the DX-10, which has a double turntable and buttons arranged around it (the traditional Yaesu way), requiring some adjustment. The FT-710's buttons are all on top, making it very intuitive, unlike previous Yaesu designs. However, this was actually Yaesu's first pure SDR radio, so the difference is understandable. Also, the lights on the FT-710's turntable are quite nice (they can be customized and turned off). Another difference is that the DX-10 has a larger screen, similar to the 7300. While the 710's screen is also 4.3 inches, it's wider and shorter, so it actually feels like the 710's screen is smaller than the 7300's. However, from DX-101 to DX-10 to the 710, the screen resolutions are all the same, and they are all very clear (similar to the 7610), so Yaesu has really gone all out this time. Since SDR radios were already behind ICOM's 7300 by quite a bit, this feels like overdoing it.

BG7NOD

BG6HFD 然后指标上710的灵敏度比DX10更高一丢丢，但是RMDR等复杂环境处理能力上DX10因为构架原因更胜一筹，实际上我是个小白，我也体会不出来。（有点大的DX10在杂物间最里面待着，小巧又漂亮的710才是心头爱）

Saurlax

BG7NOD 请问 FT710 方便带出去野架吗。我看网上说 ICOM7300 已经算是重量极限了，DX10 非常沉，不知道 FT710 怎么样

BG6HFD

BG7NOD 这么看来目前710是性价比最高的设备了

闽ICP备2021006864号-7

闽公网安备35020602002794号互联网举报中心

用户协议隐私政策社区规范积分规则中继规则转载须知
更新日志联系我们常见问题友情链接运营报告赞助

浩奇科技（厦门）有限公司

是无线电，把我们联系在一起