I forgot to check the forum yesterday, but I received a lot of replies and suggestions today, thank you everyone! Here's a summary of the common questions and their corresponding answers:
Questions about Wubi BG8LGP BI4MIG ：
Five-笔 has two main issues: firstly, its coverage of phonetic input is not as broad as Pinyin; and secondly, the system may be suitable for encoding in the human brain, but not for decoding. For computers, Five-笔 can indeed quickly filter out repeated Chinese characters based on their shapes. However, each letter in the Five-笔 input method represents multiple Chinese character components, which may place a heavy burden on the human brain to construct Chinese characters directly from these possible combinations (unless one already knows what combination of letters represents a particular Chinese character). In actual CW communication, it relies on a "Learn by listeningThe auditory muscle memory allows me to immediately recognize what information a specific sequence of tones represents. From this perspective, the phonetic encoding method might be a bit convoluted.
Considerations regarding dual-entry BG4ILW ：
The problem with using the same symbol to represent both vowels and consonants is that it creates two issues: First, for decoders, it can be confusing, as they have to determine whether a particular code represents a consonant or a vowel, which can lead to mental block and make it difficult to fully understand the message. Second, it reduces the reliability of continuous transmissions. While strict rules governing "one character at a time" can mitigate this issue, if a mistake is made due to haste or a missed code, the resulting mismatch in vowels and consonants will completely alter the received message.
Using different symbols for initial and final syllables can avoid this problem. It also allows for the transmission of codes in sequence, making "tokenization" simpler. For example, using spaces to separate words like in the sentence "这句话", provides additional semantic information that aids understanding. If characters cannot be transmitted consecutively, an extra delimiter is required.
Regarding pronunciation issues xyzyx Syryia ：
This system is indeed a phonetic transcription system (hence the title "Chinese"A plan, rather than..."Chinese characters"The proposed solution). However, the issue of phonetic codes is not that significant, as Chinese Braille is also entirely phonetic (when considering phonetics, it largely draws on the one-sound-one-syllable approach used in current Chinese Braille). Given that CW communication is inherently an auditory rather than a visual language, I believe that simply making it purely phonetic would be sufficient.
Questions regarding application scenarios BI7LVX ：
Actually, I hadn't even thought about potential applications yet. When I came across this, it was purely a discovery. The modern standard Mandarin pronunciation system can be neatly organized into a 2*4*The table for "4" would be a waste if it wasn't compared to the structure of binary or Morse code. It was just an impulsive idea (hence the "fun" tag), and I didn't think about replacing the commonly used English CW communication language at the time. Using it for emergency communication wouldn't be possible either.
The idea was that Japan and South Korea already have encoding schemes for their respective "languages," so I thought it would be interesting to try creating one for Chinese. If there were other people interested in this system, we could potentially work together to develop a more scientific encoding system, and then test it out with CW communication in the air, just like the older Japanese and Korean ham radio operators do (the core of amateur radio is experimentation).
闽ICP备2021006864号-7
闽公网安备35020602002794号
互联网举报中心