BG5UWQ Perhaps some of the forum's functions could be separated into independent websites or even made static, which would reduce the burden of moderation?
Or, even if volunteers are involved, can they only access de-identified data? For example, can they only view the content of posts that are in the review process, without being able to see who posted them directly.
Or, could it involve moving the extraneous content to overseas stations, while domestic stations focus on technical discussions or transition into a UGC platform similar to QSL.net, featuring long articles and comment sections? This would allow only a few editors to review the content, thereby improving its quality (making it feel like a HamCQ manual).
BG5UWQ In fact, there is a technology called "confidential computing" that was initially developed by users who were concerned about the potential negative impact of public clouds on their own systems. Its purpose is to reduce trust to the level of the CPU vendor, thereby resisting data theft from virtual machine hosts or those with direct access to hardware. In simple terms, it's similar to the defensive measures used in an Xbox console.
Of course, a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) itself is necessary, because no one can guarantee that there won't be another "ghost" or vulnerability.
闽ICP备2021006864号-7
闽公网安备35020602002794号
互联网举报中心