yuhjnmwe 1. Does a call sign constitute personal information? A call sign, also known as a radio station identification code, is associated with the device, not the person.
2. The information linking a call sign to an individual, while clearly personal data, is not accessible to the general public, and I have also not collected it.
3. I only collected the content of the posts, not the call sign authentication information. Obviously, it is impossible to determine if a user owns a specific call sign based solely on their username.
4. The data I collect complies with the web scraping protocol of the website being scraped.
5. Article 4 of the Personal Information Protection Law states that personal information refers to various types of information related to identifiable natural persons, recorded in electronic or other forms, excluding anonymized information. Callsigns clearly fall under the category of anonymized information. For example, a driver's license number is just a string of numbers if it is not associated with a name; however, if it is associated with a name, it becomes personal information. The data I have collected obviously does not associate callsigns with natural persons.
6. I am simply stating the facts: "legal vacuum" means anything goes, and if there is a legal vacuum, then using it is perfectly legitimate and reasonable. If you believe this is not reasonable, you can raise these concerns with the National People's Congress Legal Affairs Commission.
7. Please study BG5EPM and, when raising reasonable questions, cite the relevant legal provisions verbatim. Do not misinterpret the relevant laws and regulations and then attempt to retroactively justify your position.