泉盛k5很火，但经常能看到人说灵敏度不行。那各位大佬有没有灵敏度好的手台推荐？

没上过测试仪，但是同样原装天线同样静噪，泉盛k6收不到的，宝锋UV5R可以收到，YAESU的VX6R也可以收到。收航空频k6底噪也很大，VX6R几乎没什么底噪。

@"BH4FCY"#p51060 灵敏度用 SINAD 13测不用 12 的那个？

@"BG5ELQ"#p51061 我也想说，哈哈，欧讯的特色从官方参数看k5的灵敏度算非常好的

K5K6 还可以吧那个 “灵敏度” 一般的测试里指的都是 “S1 下开启喇叭的最小电平”，这个 “S1” 的水平如何定义是软件（固件）决定的，和硬件性能无关。>!我觉得都是图一乐测试。!

@"BG2ELG"#p51070 那为什么会出现那种，xxx能收到，k5收不到的情况呢（我手头只有5r和k5，没遇到过）？

Are there any handheld radios with good sensitivity?

Xtacking

The QuanSheng K5 is very popular, but I often hear people complain about its sensitivity. So, could any experienced users recommend a good-sensitivity handheld radio?

BG5LU

IC-R30😊

zyajunww

I haven't used a test instrument, but the original antenna produces the same level of noise. The QuanSheng K6 doesn't receive it, but the BaoFeng UV5R does. The Yaesu VX6R also receives it. The QuanSheng K6 has a lot of inherent noise, while the VX6R has very little.

BH4FCY

Try out the Wouxun handheld radio.

BG5ELQ

BH4FCY Is the sensitivity measured using SINAD 13, without needing 12?

BG5GNC-NingBo

BG5ELQ I also want to say that, haha, Wouxun's unique features are...
According to official specifications, the K5's sensitivity is very good.

BG2ELG

K5K6 also seems fine.

The "sensitivity" typically referred to in these tests usually means "the minimum level required to activate the speaker at S1," and the definition of "S1" is determined by the software (firmware), not by the hardware performance.I think it's all a test by Tu Ya Le.

Xtacking

BG2ELG So, why does that situation occur where xxx can receive signals but K5 cannot (I only have a 5R and a K5, and I haven't encountered this)?

BH2XAY

The scattered king.

BH2XIY

6R Bar

BH2XAY

VX-6R

BA7NXV

Based on actual usage experience, the K6's ability to handle weak signals is relatively poor.
(Compared to the A360PLUS from Topon)

闽ICP备2021006864号-7

闽公网安备35020602002794号互联网举报中心

用户协议隐私政策社区规范积分规则中继规则转载须知
更新日志联系我们常见问题友情链接运营报告赞助

浩奇科技（厦门）有限公司

是无线电，把我们联系在一起